What is the 1967 legal decision that changed the arrest procedures of juveniles?

The 1967 legal decision that significantly changed the arrest procedures of juveniles is the case of Gault. This landmark ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court established that juveniles have the same rights as adults in the criminal justice system, including the right to due process. Prior to this decision, the standards for juvenile proceedings were less formal, and many constitutional protections were often overlooked.

The Gault case specifically addressed the issue of adequate legal representation and the right to a fair hearing. It ruled that minors were entitled to the same legal safeguards as adults, which includes the right to notice of charges, the right to legal counsel, and the right to confront witnesses. This shift recognized that minors, while still being held accountable for their actions, deserved protection against potential abuses within the juvenile justice system.

Other options pertain to different aspects of legal rights and procedures but do not specifically address juvenile arrest procedures. Wade, Escobedo, and Miranda focus on adult legal rights, such as the right to counsel and protection against self-incrimination. Gault distinctly changed how juvenile cases are approached, ensuring that young individuals receive fair treatment during legal proceedings.